IT Outsourcing outcomes: Didn’t they show up?

Home / Knowledge Resources / Articles / IT Outsourcing outcomes: Didn’t they show up?

Alfredo SaadAlfredo Saad – IT Outsourcing Consultant

Do the C-level executives of your organization live a latent feeling of frustration with the outcomes of their IT outsourcing project?

You, as the organization’s CIO, to whom was assigned 3 years ago the responsibility of leading the project and, later on, of managing the outsourcing contract have been hearing one or more of the following questions?

  • “Where is the promised 20% IT budget reduction?”
  • “Shouldn’t our provider be proposing us new and innovative IT solutions to support our business operations?”
  • “Why our end-users perceive a worsening trend in the outsourced services quality?”
  • “Why our provider shows a mere reactive attitude and, yet worse, with slow and inefficient actions?”
  • “Why our provider shows such a deep ignorance about the critical and priority factors of our business concerning the outsourced services?”

Such questions are more and more frequently heard in an explicit or veiled way and tend to consolidate the widespread perception, inside the organization, that the outsourcing project has been conducted in an inept way.

The cases of success and failure of such projects teach us a great lesson: the quality (or the lack of) of the decisions taken along the project steps shows (for the good and for the evil) a cumulative effect that afterwards determines the achievement or not of the intended benefits.

The main decision areas that could have caused the misstep of our hypothetical CIO are highlighted below:

  1. Have the strategic, tactical and operational business drivers, which supported the outsourcing decision, been correctly identified?
  2. Were the scope of services, the deployment strategy and the delivery model defined coherently with the business drivers?
  3. Was the approach to the outsourcing market made adequately with an RFP that clearly stated the requirements of the buyer organization without any ambiguities?
  4. Was the provider(s) selection process consistent with the final objectives to be achieved through a balanced evaluation of all factors involved (financial, technical, operational, etc)?
  5. After selecting the provider(s), did the contract negotiation discussions prioritize all critical aspects that would enable the effective achievement of the results that would support the business drivers initially defined?
  6. After signing the contract, was services transition deployed safely and smoothly concerning all human and technical resources transferred?
  7. After transition completion, did the day-to-day operations aggregate a solid governance process that motivated a cooperative attitude of both parties, making it viable the emergence of innovative solutions along the contract lifetime?

It should be noted that the questions above constitute a chain of causes and effects, whose rupture, at any stage, will impact the general effectiveness of the project. In other words, only the adequate guidance during all stages will make it viable a virtuous cumulative effect that will result in an unquestionable project success.

Have you lived (or currently lives) the scenario described here? Do you agree with the concepts presented? Enrich the discussion with your comments.

Alfredo Saad has been acting on IT Strategic Outsourcing Services area since 1997. In 2006 he published the book “IT Services Outsourcing” (Brasport Publishing House). Risk Manager of all IBM Strategic Outsourcing contracts in Brazil (2009-2014). From March 2014 on, he has been acting as an independent consultant, lecturer and writer on IT Outsourcing as the principal of his own company, Saad Consulting.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: